On the subject of expression and censorship

Categorized As:

I recently received an email from a business owner who informed me that she would not be advertising in Crochet me because of a boycott against the magazine I've neither heard nor discovered anything else about. Her reason involved her interpretation of comments made by, or in perceived affiliation with, one or more designers who have been published in these pages about patterns that we've published.

I had a brief email exchange with the potential advertiser, and I've mildly edited one of my emails to her below, in case you're interested in my editorial stance on freedom of expression:

... Having designs or articles published on our site does not take away any designer's freedom to express their opinions in any way they choose.

Criticism is an integral factor in the creative process. I value the feedback I receive about Crochet me, and I hope the designers I work with value feedback as well. I could decide not to publish designs or articles by designers whose opinions I disagree with (or for any other reason, at that). However, I choose designs and articles based on their own merit (construction, design, colour, texture, quality of pattern writing, etc.), not based on any opinion I have formed about the personality or actions of the designer or writer.

Although I recognize that I may lose a small bit of revenue, I am content as an editor to be standing behind people's right to express themselves. Our readership is growing, and that is the gauge I use to measure the success of this publication.

I appreciate how effective a boycott can be. Before I decide to act on a boycott, however, I do a lot of research to ensure that my decision is based on fact and not on inaccurate assumptions. I will be perfectly happy to continue making little money from Crochet me and having our readership grow as rapidly as it is, in order to continue to be dedicated to publishing high-quality and innovative patterns and articles in the interest of sparking people's creativity and advancing the craft of crochet.

We're not yet making enough money to pay designers and writers and volunteer editors and other contributors. I hope that some day soon more members of the crochet industry will be eager to reach out to crocheters through our site. But what I said is true: This magazine is not hurting because of a lack of funding. The fabulous, generous, people who donate their time, creativity, sweat, and dedication to this publication are a wildly talented and diverse lot. Their choices, opinions, beliefs, and actions beyond the pages of this magazine are their business. And whether I agree with them or not, I'll defend their right to have them until I'm blue in the face.


Wha? A boycott? Of...a free magazine?!? Heck no, we won't use your FREE patterns? Geez.

Submitted by mk (not verified) on 16 August 2005 - 3:49pm.

I have no idea if the "boycott" is a concerted effort. I really don't think it's a big thing; traffic's way up this month. :)

Submitted by Kim Werker (not verified) on 20 August 2005 - 2:22am.

Freedom of expression is a basic right! No one should ever take it lightly - especially in this political climate! I am very pleased to read that you and those who commented realize that one's personal beliefs - especially when expressed outside of the workplace - should never be used to judge the quality of one's work. Long live the legacy of Edward R. Murrow!!!

Submitted by Shari Piper (not verified) on 23 August 2005 - 12:59am.

And there you have it, dear readers. My mom has spoken.I wanted to point that out in case you thought maybe I was a rebel. Really, I'm an apple falling close to the tree.

Submitted by Kim Werker (not verified) on 23 August 2005 - 1:43am.

Crazy. Well, I see nothing wrong with Crochet Me, and will continue to read it. (Maybe even submit something, one day...)

Submitted by Andrea (not verified) on 23 August 2005 - 10:26am.

I applaud your editorial stance although I'm admittedly confused as to the potential advertiser's concerns. I had no idea any of the designs/designers were so controversial!

Submitted by Celeste (not verified) on 17 August 2005 - 2:34am.

Could this possibly be a spoof, hoax or a strange joke? I just don't get the point.

Submitted by Lisa (not verified) on 17 August 2005 - 7:09am.

Perhaps we could boycott that narrow-minded "business owner's" business?? :)

Submitted by Deb (not verified) on 17 August 2005 - 12:18pm.

to quote one of my favourite characters wayne from wayne's world:"Live in the now" Lady! ( i added the lady part:)

Submitted by jana (not verified) on 17 August 2005 - 12:53pm.

Now, now. I'm not upset by this business's decision; I just wanted to seize the opportunity to post about the issue. I don't want to start a riot, which is why I've been as vague as I have about the details.But I admit I enjoy that you're all raising an eyebrow, too. *wink*

Submitted by Kim (not verified) on 17 August 2005 - 1:14pm.

"Narrow-minded is as narrow-minded does." That's my stance. Let the ignorant play amongst themselves.Anyone for crochet? :)

Submitted by Amie (not verified) on 17 August 2005 - 2:04pm.

I didn't know any of the designers were so controversial either. Interesting.

Submitted by heather (not verified) on 19 August 2005 - 2:32am.

Is there some website somewhere leading this so-called boycott?

Submitted by Meg (not verified) on 20 August 2005 - 1:09am.

User login